![]() ![]() This even though three out of five CFOs say their sales teams are concerned that Covid restrictions on meetings and travel will hurt their ability to meet targets - which again suggests that upskilling to hybrid sales models and tools might be the better investment. Yet when CFOs are asked where they would put an extra dollar of sales force investment, they would allocate almost twice as much to putting more feet on the street than to training current staff and upgrading CRM software. Investment should be directed toward creating a “hybrid” sales force that’s as skilled at virtual selling as it is at face-to-face selling. ![]() Training salespeople pays off quicker than almost any other expansion activity and is especially important now, because customer buying behaviors and the demographics of buyers are changing. Invest in sales training and development. Now is the time, but what’s the path? To get meaningful results, CFOs and sales leaders should consider the following four strategies. It’s no wonder that more than 87% of CFOs tell us that they expect to spend much more time focusing on customers and the customer experience. A study by the National Center for the Middle Market shows that for midsize companies, the combination of sales force effectiveness and retaining profitable customers has more impact on growth than any other capability - 45% more than operating efficiency, 60% more than entering new markets, and more than two-and-a-half times more than innovation. The straightest line to growth goes through the sales leader. After a year of caution and retrenchment, CFOs are as hungry for growth as their sales leaders - our studies show that, across the middle market, CFOs pick top-line growth over profitability by a nearly four-to-one margin. If ever there was a perfect time to reduce the friction between the CFO and sales leader, it’s now. For example, the CEO of a heavy equipment company in the Southwest that grew sales from $325 million to over $600 million in two years told me that the relationship and shared goals between the CFO and sales leader was the number-one reason for that extraordinary growth. I’ve also seen how dramatic the benefits of collaboration can be. Having started my career as a CPA, moving on to various sales leader roles, and now having helped hundreds of CFOs and sales leaders work better together, I’m convinced that both parties have nothing but the best intentions toward each other. Intramural friction is especially damaging for middle-market companies, whose processes are informal and rely on personal interaction. The consequence: Internal friction that wastes energy that could produce the profitable growth both parties (and the CEO) want. Unfortunately, our years of experience and research support the above, the result being that the relationship between finance and sales is often more confrontational than collaborative. CFOs are trained skeptics, whereas sales leaders have to believe the next call will produce a deal. ![]() The CFO is focused on cost and efficiency, the sales leader on revenue and growth. The pandemic has changed customer buying patterns, calling all forecasts into question.Our CRM system gives incomplete data or doesn’t connect with our other data, so we can’t really see what’s going on.Our sales leader’s forecasting track record is inaccurate.After many sets of eyes stopped rolling and comments faded, my next question was, “Why?” Here’s what I heard: During two recent business relationship seminars, I asked groups of assembled CFOs, “How many of you reduce your sales leader’s forecast 25% or more each month?” Without exception, every hand went up, with many pointing to the sky, indicating that they need to discount the forecasts even more. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |